You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The NRO- before they attacked us with their rogue spy satellite [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 09:33 AM
Original message
The NRO- before they attacked us with their rogue spy satellite
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 09:43 AM by underpants
Since we all are being reintroduced into the “Super secret” world of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) this morning you might find this bit of information helpful or at least entertaining when the NRO and this rogue spy satellite that threatens life, limb, and property value (not necessarily in that order) comes up at the watercooler.

The NRO is a contracting agency. It allocates its budget to build and launch spy satellites a normal part of a sophisticated national defense system. Only problem is that the NRO is also a slush fund for defense contractors who just can’t seem to make enough money off their existing operations. This may seem hard to believe…. but defense contractors have executives privately heeled and educated along side the masters of capitalism who head Ford, Countrywide Financial, etc., so maybe it’s not so hard to believe. This was not very "super secret" in and around the Beltway mind you in fact it was the normal course of business.

Seems that the NRO over the years had stowed away about a billion dollars (commonly referred to as $1,000,000,000) and was, in a “super secret” way, able to keep these funds in an account outside the normal budget and spending constraints. The NRO had plans for this money-an office building. Now you might be thinking, “What another billion dollar boondoggle of an office building why we already have the 'Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center'?" which cost at least TWO billion of your tax dollars but to ease your selective attention span this office building was not going to be for government bureaucrats. This office building was to be built, remember with YOUR tax dollars, for defense contractors’ lobbyists. Honestly how *IS* a lobbyist supposed to do his job without a billion dallar facilty to do it in?? I mean have you forgotten 9/11!?!?!? (even before it happened)

Well who should step in but the junior Senator from Massachusetts John Kerry. He proposed in a defense spending bill to give the NRO two options: one, give back the billion dollars it had been hoarding or two, face a budget cut to reclaim 150% of these funds over 5 years. *ATTENTION SPAN ALERT*—that is $1.5 Billion over 5 years or $300 Million PER year. Kerry proposed that these funds would be taken out of their general operations funds and specifically NOT out of counter terrorism funds. * ALERT* over

One of the odder elements to the 2004 Presidential election was Sean Hannity’s take on this story. Seems he started to tell this story as Sen. Kerry CUTTING a billion dollars out of counter terrorism (all implications of Democrats weakness on defense and blame for 9/11 in effect) then as the weeks and months went on it grew. 2 billion then 3 then 4 then 4.5 then 5.5. Even casual observers like myself couldn’t figure out where he got these numbers from and why they ever so slowing were changing. His audience clearly was being lead by the nose (not new for him or the right wing media). Finally in about September of 2004 Hannity got to his number- 7.5 BILLION that Sen. Kerry had tried to cut out of the COUNTER TERRORISM budget. GASP! SHOCK! And HORROR. Notice what he did there? He multiplied by 5 instead of dividing by 5.

Anyway it all turned out that that Kerry amendment was scuttled, as was the NRO plan for the office building and the billion dollars was recouped without any counter terrorism funds ever being affected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC