You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: It's both. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
69. It's both.
It is certainly an Amendment 1 issue -- all civil or criminal laws that have to do with "free speech" issues are. Your point that there are limits on free speech is, of course, exactly right.

The OP raises an important point, too: we should always look closely at any restrictions on "free speech," or other Amendment 1 rights. Even with the issues with Miller and Cooper in the Plame case, it was important that Mr. Fitzgerald used his authority to compel testimony as a last resort.

In this case, I think the court ruled correctly. But we need to be sure it does not lead to abuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC