Reply #4: Not me - I like it when she turns up the volume - and IWR vote of trust in Bush was a

[papau]

mistake only because she should not have trusted any neo-con to tell the truth, but the IWR was not a vote to go to war.

It gave the decision on war to Bush, but only after he promised UN, truth, inspections, etc would occur before he made the decision for war - and he did none of that. Given the security situation as presented in October 2002, saying it was a mistake, like it was obvious at that point that Bush could not be trusted with American Security, is a con, in my opinion.

Hillary seems more honest than the pandering others - but that is just my opinion.

Of course that leaves Obama with the clean record on IWR, having seen Bush as untrustworthy from the beginning on the IWR. He is obviously ahead of Hillary on points on the IWR.

Meanwhile Saddam gave Bush in 2002/2003 nearly 15,000 pages of documentation that showed he had no WMD - AND BUSH CLASSIFIED 10,000 PAGES AND WENT TO WAR. Sure would like the Congress to look at those 10,000 pages for evidence that can be used in the impeachment.