You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #100: I disagree, to an extent. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Matsubara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #97
100. I disagree, to an extent.
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 08:15 AM by Matsubara
Yelling "They're fascists" in people's face brings to mind "Meathead" making his strident arguments to a dismissive Archie Bunker. In that sense, in the realm of public debate, using the word too much is probably counterproductive and tends to make the person using it seem hysterical. Besides, labels are a lot less effective in persuading people than facts and putting a human face on issues.

That being said, under a broad definition of "Fascist", I think that the present US government and administration do qualify, but that's an argument of semantics. The term is not especially useful in furthering a progressive agenda.

But whenever a Bush policy bears a strong resemblance a Nazi or fascist policy, it's perfectly reasonable to point that out.

Use of terms like "Homeland Security" (Fatherland) and "unlawful combatant" (hikokumin - "un-Japanese") make people with any grasp of history nervous for good reason. There was a time when Mussolini made the trains run on time and the German middle class felt secure, happy and free in the knowledge that their Führer was fighting to stamp out the Jewish menace and protect them from threats like... Poland and Czechoslovakia. The apparatus that reassured them that they were doing the right thing was only different from Fox News in that Fox News is much more sophisticated, and is not owned DIRECTLY by the government or Bushco.


The fact that there is still some semblance of representative democracy functioning in the US today doesn't mean we should breathe easy. The sweeping powers claimed by this administration with little opposition show just how vulnerable our own government is to the kind of changes that were brought about in the German democracy after Hitler assumed the Chancellorship and his thugs burned the Reichstag. For now, the chances are the US government won't go that far, because it's easier to keep people under their boot as long as there is some remaining illusion of freedom.

A totalitarian scenario only becomes likely after an economic collapse of severe proportions. And after 6 years of utterly unsustainable borrow-and-outsource economic policies, that doesn't seem at all farfetched to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC