Reply #158: Go read my previous posts. I had already noted that the

[merh]

politicizing of the DOJ was a hinderance. You aren't telling me anything new and it is you that is unaware of the facts and refuses to acknowledge them once they were provided to you. I merely responded to your posts and provided you with the legal opinions you said didn't exist:

So what if Rove was involved in the US attorney filings? Even caging, despicable as it was, isn't necessary illegal - and I've seen no legal opinion that says it was.

Challenging votes is not illegal. The method may be despicable
but I've seen nothing that violates any state or federal law of which I'm aware. Have you found a legal opinion to the contrary?

All caps doesn't make the allegation any more credible
And if you can't offer a legal opinion to the contrary, or cite a statute that was broken, I'm afraid you've been fooled.

I have asked anyone to support the claim, reproduced here, that caging is illegal. That's a legitimate question that goes to our credibility.

You even had the audacity to state that Rove's involvement in the DOJ firings was no big deal.

Where I come from, we call your posts replying to my posts as "crawfishin'".

:hi: