You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Let's not be daft? OK, then why are you saying DUers will defend Al Qaeda? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Let's not be daft? OK, then why are you saying DUers will defend Al Qaeda?
Al Qaeda was NOT in Iraq before Bushler bombed the country and destroyed their military, their defense AGAINST Al Qaeda. Removing Saddam CAUSED the civil war because he kept the rival religious and ethnic factions in check... and there were NO SUICIDE BOMBINGS in Iraq until AFTER Bushler invaded.

'Theocratic fear' is what we have in THIS country.

OK, you can go back to your fantasy world now. :hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC