Reply #35: I'm a big fan of yours but I respectfully and vehemently disagree.

[autorank]

Hackett is a veteran.

Hackett is a liberal.

Hackett is unapologetic about being a liberal.

Hackett is a fighter.

Hackett took it to the Republican machine in SW Ohio.

Hackett won three rural counties by 60%-40% which border Kentucky!!!!! BORDER KENTUCKY!!!!!

He "lost" by a hair but we all know he won. Read it and weep http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0508/S00186.htm

After being robbed, Hackett was the natural candidate for the Dems.

Reid and Shumer (as much as I like Reid) are political bumblers. They lose every fight. If they say yes, it's time to believe no.

Hackett is a once in a life time candidate. He's a truth teller who gets away with it, thrives on it, is well received for it.

Maybe Reid and Shumer should read the Scoop article and Fitrakis' book and talk to some of you folks. He'd find out that the issue there is not between two qualified and fine candidates, it's about winning when you win...fighting the crooked vote steelers. But noooooo...that would require real work.

Sorry, the Democrats snatched defeat from the jaws of victory one more time.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x411034