Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Reply #2: I have been waiting for years - for one moment of testimony in those hearings [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-05-07 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have been waiting for years - for one moment of testimony in those hearings
to get some airing. It appeared for exactly *one day* in the news. During the hearings the CIA reps who had been responsible for preparing the NIE explained that the form of the NIE that reached Congress was vastly stripped down from the original NIE that was reviewed (by the WH, I believe). What was stripped down were a lot of caveats and footnotes that qualified different 'claims' - explaining, for example, why X piece of intelligence may not be credible or may not have been verified by a second source. What was stunning was that when asked WHO had ordered and made the change - the authors/preparers of the report stated - on the record - that they really did not know how or why of at whose request the report as it was prepared for congress had been edited.

Significant in several ways - gets right to the heart of "everyone thought Iraq had WMDs" and that "people in Congress had the same intel as the WH" .... which is the core of trying to blame dems in congress equally as the WH - and framing the 'mistake' as bad intel that "anyone would have believed. It gets right to the point that NO what the WH had and what was given to the Congress was vastly different.

It also gets to the heart of the manipulation of intelligence to fool congress and the people as to the "why" of going to war (a story line much of the public now accepts thanks to the Downing Street Memos - but getting the details of WHO ordered the changes and what those changes were is important.)

Please Sen Rockefeller, *please* include what came from this part of the testimony and investigations in the final reports you release from this Investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  Senator Rockefeller and the Senate Intelligence Committee Phase II Report Lasher  Jan-05-07 04:57 AM   #0 
   k & r  cui bono   Jan-05-07 06:24 AM   #1 
   I have been waiting for years - for one moment of testimony in those hearings  salin   Jan-05-07 06:42 AM   #2 
   For reasons like this, Jay might not release the segments as quickly as some expect  Lasher   Jan-05-07 06:57 AM   #3 
      After reading this Larry Johnson piece - per the Negroponte demotion...  salin   Jan-05-07 07:02 AM   #4 
         Missed that angle, thanks salin  Lasher   Jan-05-07 07:20 AM   #6 
   I'd like to see Pat Roberts and Warner pay for helping Bush start  Hubert Flottz   Jan-05-07 07:14 AM   #5 
   Me too, Hubert  Lasher   Jan-05-07 07:26 AM   #7 
      My couch is on fire!  Hubert Flottz   Jan-05-07 07:40 AM   #8 
   K and R!  Hubert Flottz   Jan-05-07 08:45 AM   #9 
   This is going to be FIREWORKS.  Gregorian   Jan-05-07 10:46 AM   #10 
   I'll believe it when I see it  George Oilwellian   Jan-05-07 11:27 AM   #11 
   I know. Nothing is making sense. n/t  Gregorian   Jan-05-07 02:21 PM   #13 
   I get confused too  Lasher   Jan-05-07 09:48 PM   #15 
   Rockefeller has tried to be bipartisan  Lasher   Jan-05-07 09:43 PM   #14 
   Having a good Dem like Rockefeller charing this committee is crucial.  speedoo   Jan-05-07 12:02 PM   #12 
      Jay is the guy who can lay it out for all to see: These assholes lied us into war  Lasher   Jan-05-07 10:00 PM   #16 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC