Reply #34: Haha, no I'm not

[JohMunich99]

But most importantly I'm not declaring it's civil war either.

Is it too much to suggest that since all the poster has is a three day old source of somewhat questionable merit and an article that makes it seem like both sides are saying that Sadr is attacking American targets not Iraqi government ones, Iraq isn't in Civil War?! Now if the poster was on the ground in Iraq and talking to military leaders on all sides, than I might give the poster some credit. But for now, that's the only thing that's going to boost this posters' case. That are a lot of more articles that are recent.

Are you trying to suggest I'm wrong for doubting the poster's conclusion? Do you want the Iraqis to go into civil war or something? I personally think they have already suffered enough. I guess DU can tolerate all kinds of "humanitarians" though.

Finally: "Note this is a DU Exclusive as the press or even the Internet has not picked this up yet!" Do you understand this claim? If neither the press or "the Internet" has picked this up (despite the link provided), I'm not sure what else could be the source for this poster's info unless again, they were on the ground in Iraq or calling sources who were there.