17. It sounds like they are trying to tie "liberals" with "terrorists"
or something.
It makes no sense for any liberal person to think that the DLC is on their side. Does they DLC really think that there are so few liberals? Or that so few people were against the war - it's over 60% (of all Americans) now. Or that people are going to keep voting for people who do not represent them?
That writer (anonymously) arguing that Democrats should have supported Lieberman even though they disagreed with him. It makes no sense.
S/he even mentions something about Lieberman and the civil rights era "he went to Mississippi to fight for civil rights in 1964"- do we have to go back that far to find agreement? :crazy:
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
