You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why must everything be a conspiracy? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 08:58 PM
Original message
Why must everything be a conspiracy?
Advertisements [?]
Now I am not knocking all the people out there who think that each and every thing that happens is a conspiracy. In fact, the more I look at voter fraud in 2000 and 2004, the more likely it seems that it really happened. And I also believe that while bush and co. did not commit 9/11, they certainly had the information to try and prevent it. But it does seem that a few (not all) people in here think that everything must be a conspiracy, without any concrete evidence. The arrest of terrorists in Canada last week, the death of AlZarqawi, the beheading of Berg last year, deaths of various progressives, New Orleans wall explosions, and on and on.
Lets face it people, the majority of conspiracy theories are based on less than verifiable evidence and should not be taken all that seriously. An example. The terrorist plot uncovered in Canada last week. Some say (sounds like faux news) that it was all a ploy to make the new conservative government up there look good in the U.S administration's eyes. I say bull****. The RCMP investigated this plot for quite a while and moved when they thought it was necessary; that is when they had solid evidence. That is the way most police investigations go. Another one; JFK Jr. was killed by someone in power. Or maybe he was not a real good pilot. I don't know, neither do you.
Just remember how implausible some of the stuff against Clinton seemed in the '90's and stop and think before you accuse anyone of some sort of conspiracy stuff. As already stated, I do think that there is something to Election fraud in the last two Presidential elections, in fact 2000 seems irrefutable, but some of the other stuff is just speculation and circumstantial stuff, or entirely made up from a fertile imagination. Proof, we need absolute irrefutable proof. If we have it, then it will be easy to bring the bush gang down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC