You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #217: yes I read it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-31-06 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #214
217. yes I read it
since the NPS website has the correct scientific age and the letter writer says NPS can't give the correct scientific age (yet offers no evidence of this), then obviously the letter writer is lying. They're just complaining about a book they don't like.

Did you read the NPS website. bottom of first paragraph.

"Geologic formations such as gneiss and schist found at the bottom of the Canyon date back 1,800 million years."

the PEER letter writer is incorrect about what the NPS is permitted to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC