You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: THANK YOU [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
47. THANK YOU
for posting this.

I spent a YEAR making a film about electronic voting and interviewed some of the TOP people in the field and I can say without a doubt that THIS is how we will LOSE.

Paper is exactly what the right wing WANTS, it goes BYE BYE SO easily, or is not counted.

Here's how she works folks. The electronic votes will in each "neck and neck" race (and if you notice they ALL SEEM TO BE "neck and neck" How odd) will count the votes in such a manner that the total will fall BELOW the legal CAUSE to RECOUNT. At that point all the PAPER will be thrown away, provisionals FIRST.

This is how they do it every time. "SORRY we cannot LEGALLY open this for a recount since there is only a 3% difference."

PERIOD.

We interviewed the former Democratic Gov of Alabama, and he went to bed as the WINNER of the election and woke up the LOSER. HOW? In the very dead of Night, in the Baldwin County courthouse RIELLY and his den of thieves kicked ALL Poll workers and Media OUT and electronically moved 6500 votes from his opponents column to his OWN. NO OTHER Totals changed in the entire state.

They Blamed it on a lightning strike in an area where there were not even 6500 VOTERS to switch, and if a computer gets a power surge it DOES NOT move votes. It crashes and dies.

THIS was the primordial and primitive way, and led the way for more sophisticated theft.

When Rielly's oponent sought a recount the DA simply REFUSED to open the ballot 'box' for a recount, the catch? Catch 22.

"We cannot open the Ballot Box to prove there was irregularities unless you prove there were irregularities" which could only be proven by opening the Ballot Box.

Cute. And you don't think the Alabama swamps are FULL of votes? All PAPER. They find them in trunks of police cars there, storage units, etc.

This is NOT the way. If you want someone you can trust on this subject read anything by Mark Crispin Miller or Congressman Conyers.

DO NOT listen to Bev Harris as she has proved herself on this board and others, and be wary of anyone who promotes her in any fashion - there are many out there with ego driven agendas who are NOT helping this movement.

So vote early and vote often (that's a joke, son) :)

Once again THANK YOU for posting this, and doing such a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC