Reply #123: You think you know what you are talking about, but you are clueless.

[file83]

So completely and utterly clueless about my sympathies.

You have also lost all moral sight of what this whole war is about in the fog of your meaningless celebration of one perpetrator's passing.

You dare to condescendingly remind me of the people he killed, yet conveniently left out how many innocent people have died at the hands of our U.S. weapons and the crossfire we have created in a sovereign nation that we invaded without justifiable cause.

This war was started (as Bush has always claimed) to draw all the world's terrorists (including Al-Zarqawi) to Iraq. You're familiar with the phrase, "fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here."

So the United States essentially invited Al-Zarqawi to Iraq to fight a war. Bush even went so far as to urge our enemies with the words "Bring 'em on!"

Well, Al-Zarqawi brought it, as have many others. And he killed all those people from his side of the battle in a war that we designed. We have killed many innocents from our side as well.

And so now, he's dead, along with 10's of thousands of other people.

Tell me, if the Police lured a serial killer into your home ("to fight him in there so we don't have to fight him out here!") and your family was killed in the ensuing battle, would you be happy with the outcome of the serial killer's demise?

Sure, now you have jumped to some sort of childish conclusion that I shed a tear for Al-Zarqawi, but I shed none for him.

I shed a tear for how fucking far off track our nation has gone in this war on terror where people are "THRILLED" that after 3 fucking years one man is dead, despite all the innocent women and children we ended up killing in that pursuit.