You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: (sigh) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. (sigh)
do you want me to argue the "other side"? I can, if you like, but right now I'm talking with someone who believes one side - so I'm pointing out *those* flaws....

**there is to indicate she was intoxicated when she arrived at the party.**

Actually the neighbor's statement made (along with the other dancer - who yes, is a tad suspect) indicates that when the AV arrived she appeared completely "normal". She was wearing jeans and HIGH HEEL Strappy shoes - the kind that are hard enough to walk in gracefully - period, much less over an uneven surface - much less while inebriated. :) (

I'm sorry, but I discount pretty much anything by "defense sources"... they have a clear cut agenda of trying to influence public opinion. Including well-orchestrated "press conferences".

Mr. Nifong suggested - okay - I stand corrected. But was that the first or 2nd line up? As stated - I think they really dropped the ball "just putting the lacross players" on there.


**Then why did they take the time to clean up?
They didn't. The police reported that they found evidence of a party but no one on the scene.**

Then why did one of the defense attorney's say they did? (oh yeah, that's right - I can't count anything he says. lol)

The "timeline" has conflicting stories - from different people and different sources. Including the questionable "time-stamped" photographs.

One thing I've seen mentioned is that Seligmann bears a close resemblance to another player.... (whose name I forget at the moment).

They got out of the blue car, too, remember? When they were "asked back into the house" - or maybe someone was shoving her in the car, or trying to pull her from the car? I dunno. The picture "looks funny", though.

I'm curious why the neighbor has never said anything about the color of the car. It makes sense they left in the blue car (later 911 call) - but why did the cabbie say they left in an "old white car"? Big diff.

The THIRD time? I'd heard about ONE previous time, but TWO previous times? Do you have link for that?

I think the case has been handled badly from the get go. But that doesn't mean the girl is lying. Doesn't mean she's telling the truth, either, for that matter. I want the truth to come out and for justice to be down.

I have absolutely not made any "decision" as to the guilt or innocence of any party. I do not have enough information to make that kind of decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC