|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there. Note: Always use the preview key before you postPreparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
- A Decade of Defiance and Deception, makes no mention of Osama bin Laden or al Qaeda-whitehouse.gov
- President Bush Meets with Prime Minister Blair- whitehouse.gov
- No proof links Iraq, al-Qaida, Colin Powell says- msnbc.msn.com
- There's absolutely no evidence that Iraq was supporting al Qaeda, ever-Richard Clarke- cbsnews.com
- Former top weapons inspector said yesterday he and other investigators have not found evidence of a Hussein-Al Qaeda link- boston.com
- Bush Rejects Saddam 9/11 link-BBC News
- Leaked report rejects Iraqi al-Qaeda link -BBC News
- Sept 16, 2003 Rumsfeld sees no link between Saddam Hussein, 9/11- usatoday.com
- No evidence of Iraq-Al Qaeda ties: 9/11 commission-cnn.com
- April 15, 2005Levin Releases Newly Declassified Intelligence Documents on Iraq-al Qaeda Relationship- levin.senate.gov
- CIA Review Finds No Evidence Saddam Had Ties to Islamic Terrorists-Commondreams.org
- June 17, 2004 Official Verdict: White House Misled World Over Saddam- commondreams.org
- October 7, 2004 Saddam no serious threat: US report- theage.com
- January 23, 2004 Iraq and al Qaeda: What Evidence?- americanprogress.org
- August 15, 2002 Don't Attack Saddam - opinionjournal.com
- 7/25/2003 White House 'delayed 9-11 report'- upi.com
- October 25, 2002 Pentagon Team Told to Seek Details of Iraq-Al Qaeda Ties - washingtonpost.com
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War IntelligenceThe Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operationsPro-war propaganda operationsData on Military and Civilian LossesPrison Abuse and ScandalsThe Iraqi ReconstructionBritain's Role in the Iraq WarMiscellaneous Topics I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding
This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner
My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding
Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner
You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha
I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding
While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said {/u]–lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said {/u], November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP)
I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo follwoing the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. jsut some thoughts. --melissinha
|