You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: Thanks. I think the important thing to keep in mind is that unlike [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks. I think the important thing to keep in mind is that unlike
Edited on Fri Aug-07-09 10:49 AM by beachmom
so many other issues, this is not a partisan issue. Democrats are split and Republicans are split. There are competing interests going on here: both big corporate and little guys, on either side.

I have reflected some more on this issue, and the one thing that interests me is fairness among the three categories of radio: satellite, internet, and terrestrial.

Just remember there are two types of royalties: publishing (to whoever wrote the song) and performance (the actual recording).

The way it swings out is here:

1. Terrestrial radio: pays publishing royalties only. Currently pays 0 for performance royalties.
2. Satellite radio: pays both publishing royalties and performance royalties, but at a more reasonable rate.
3. Internet radio: pays both publishing royalties and performance royalties, at a much higher rate than satellite.

Internet radio is targeted unfairly here because its digital medium was viewed as a "perfect copy" of a CD, which it is not. It is not a download, but streaming; however, copyright law from the '90s does not make that distinction. I find this ridiculous. Especially since internet radio (even the big corporate ones like AOL or Yahoo) is far superior to Satellite and Terrestrial in terms of quality programming and incredible variety.

I guess to me, if performance royalties are here to stay, then they should be shared among all three radio platforms equally. So I would support the terrestrial radio performance royalty only if an amendment was added that this is regardless of platform. Why should greedy record companies take advantage of a loophole and target one medium above the others? Make the rate reasonable and put in a lower rate for smaller radio stations, for internet radio and local FM radio (Satellite is only big companies).

Edit:

To be clear, I am talking about music here. Clearly, Sat Radio is about more than music, and for long commuters I would think Sat Radio is a must have for the car if you can come up with the $12/month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC