ZombieHorde
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
| 39. "No longer existant does not mean never existed." |
|
I agree, my children's club argument was bad.
Suppose a group of people from 1785 were to Rip Van Winkle themselves to 1835. They would still 'imagine' the Articles of Confederation to be the law of the land and their state currency to have value, yet neither would be the case even if they didn't encounter anyone who knew otherwise. This is because government, monetary value, laws, etc. operate independently of human imagination. Another example would be a group of children who are ignorant of the government under which they live. They don't imagine their local government, yet it operates.
I agree, even if someone has no concept of a law, that person may be affected by it. The reason is other people do have a concept of the law, and they act on those concepts.
Laws are agreements some people make. Legislators pass a law, "no smoking in schools." The police have already agreed to enforce any law the legislator has passed. The schools agree to cooperate, most of the students agree to cooperate, etc. I think we both agree on this.
What is the source of agreements? Where are agreements? I think the answer is our imaginations.
|
| -Imaginary things even many skeptics believe in. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-14-11 12:17 PM |
#0 |
-
I disagree |
TZ |
Jul-14-11 01:03 PM |
#1 |
 -
I did not claim, and I do not believe abstract concepts are imaginary. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-14-11 01:23 PM |
#2 |
-
Isn't anything measurable real? |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jul-14-11 04:35 PM |
#3 |
 -
Let's examine it. Will you pick one and talk about how you would measure it? nt |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-14-11 05:20 PM |
#5 |
-
I've never understood the appeal of virgins. |
laconicsax |
Jul-14-11 04:41 PM |
#4 |
 -
explanation is easy |
lazarus |
Jul-14-11 07:10 PM |
#6 |
 -
Apparently, Jihadist Muslims would kill for a pack of inexperienced lovers. nt |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-14-11 09:20 PM |
#7 |
 -
I understand it perfectly |
TZ |
Jul-15-11 07:01 AM |
#8 |
-
Political borders |
semillama |
Jul-15-11 11:40 AM |
#9 |
 -
Good one. nt |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-15-11 01:00 PM |
#10 |
 -
etc for the ones delinated by natural features like rivers and oceans. |
TZ |
Jul-15-11 02:02 PM |
#11 |
-
The border of any country is imaginary. People who think they are measuring actual boarders |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-02-11 05:04 PM |
#61 |
-
Are you saying that the Rio Grande is imaginary, or... |
laconicsax |
Aug-02-11 05:11 PM |
#62 |
-
I am saying... |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-02-11 05:16 PM |
#64 |
-
free will |
enki23 |
Jul-15-11 07:10 PM |
#12 |
 -
Amen |
jberryhill |
Jul-18-11 09:25 PM |
#16 |
-
7. A coherent self. |
Odin2005 |
Jul-15-11 08:01 PM |
#13 |
-
Snuffleupagus |
Deep13 |
Jul-15-11 10:38 PM |
#14 |
-
The value of money |
jberryhill |
Jul-18-11 09:24 PM |
#15 |
 -
The shared belief and resulting agreement makes it real. |
laconicsax |
Jul-18-11 10:58 PM |
#17 |
-
The value is entirely imaginary |
jberryhill |
Jul-18-11 11:09 PM |
#18 |
 -
Bad analogy. |
laconicsax |
Jul-19-11 12:03 AM |
#19 |
-
"it's legitimacy as having value is backed by law" |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-23-11 10:31 PM |
#23 |
-
You've defined imaginary as 'only existing in our imagination.' |
laconicsax |
Jul-24-11 12:06 AM |
#26 |
-
Those things don't exist outside of our imaginations. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-24-11 02:14 AM |
#27 |
-
No longer existant does not mean never existed. |
laconicsax |
Jul-24-11 05:04 PM |
#34 |
-
"No longer existant does not mean never existed." |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-25-11 02:01 PM |
#39 |
-
Imaginary things can have real results; e.g., religion. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-23-11 10:27 PM |
#22 |
-
Is it my imagination that I can exchange money for goods and services? |
laconicsax |
Jul-23-11 11:50 PM |
#24 |
-
No, but the amount and type of goods and services you can aquire with money |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-24-11 02:28 AM |
#28 |
-
I think you mean artificial, not imaginary. |
laconicsax |
Jul-24-11 05:06 PM |
#35 |
-
I think artificial constructs only exist in our imaginations. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-25-11 01:46 PM |
#38 |
-
"Imagination," "imaginary," "imagined," etc. are inadequate terms for this discussion. |
laconicsax |
Jul-25-11 05:14 PM |
#40 |
-
Gods and imaginary friends may be very different from person to person, |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-26-11 01:32 PM |
#42 |
-
This will quickly become semantics but to me imaginary does not equal nonexistent. |
dmallind |
Jul-22-11 11:24 AM |
#20 |
 -
"Laws certainly exist in tangible written form, data bits, etc," |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-23-11 10:24 PM |
#21 |
-
I have to ask you to name something that truly does exist, by your criteria |
Orrex |
Jul-23-11 11:56 PM |
#25 |
 -
If something can be, even if no one knows about it, then it is real. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-24-11 02:40 AM |
#29 |
-
Is the number 3 real? |
Orrex |
Jul-24-11 06:37 AM |
#30 |
-
The concept of the number three is a real concept, but there is no three. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-24-11 11:21 AM |
#31 |
-
I disagree, and you're still equivocating |
Orrex |
Jul-24-11 12:30 PM |
#32 |
-
"Government is an aritifical construct imbued by its creators" |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-24-11 01:14 PM |
#33 |
-
Explain to me what you mean by a "real concept" |
Orrex |
Jul-24-11 08:14 PM |
#36 |
-
"Explain to me what you mean by a "real concept" |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-25-11 01:41 PM |
#37 |
-
You just contradicted yourself. |
trotsky |
Jul-26-11 09:43 AM |
#41 |
-
An honest mistake on my part. Why reinvent the wheel? Let's look at the dictionary. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-26-11 01:42 PM |
#43 |
-
OK, you pick the definition(s) you want to use. |
trotsky |
Jul-26-11 01:55 PM |
#44 |
-
OK. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-26-11 02:44 PM |
#45 |
-
Ah, now you're shifting your equivocation to the word "imaginary." |
trotsky |
Jul-27-11 06:10 AM |
#46 |
-
I started my OP with the word imaginary. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-27-11 10:18 AM |
#47 |
-
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jul-27-11 10:27 AM |
#48 |
-
Seriously, dude? |
trotsky |
Jul-27-11 02:41 PM |
#50 |
 -
Fallacious arguments make me sad. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-28-11 01:43 AM |
#52 |
-
On that we completely agree. n/t |
trotsky |
Jul-28-11 06:05 AM |
#54 |
-
That, by the way, was the opener to my international law class |
jberryhill |
Aug-08-11 12:33 AM |
#76 |
-
To my fellow skeptics. |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-27-11 12:19 PM |
#49 |
 -
Isn't one major point really that imaginary things might still be useful? |
greyl |
Jul-28-11 12:02 AM |
#51 |
  -
I agree, imaginary things can be very useful. nt |
ZombieHorde |
Jul-28-11 01:44 AM |
#53 |
 -
Several people have answered your questions already. |
Orrex |
Jul-29-11 12:26 PM |
#57 |
  -
I am not trying to equate real and tangible. Where is love? |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-02-11 04:50 PM |
#59 |
 -
But you have claimed that thoughts are real |
Orrex |
Aug-03-11 01:28 PM |
#69 |
 -
in a sense, they aren't imaginary. they're behavior. |
enki23 |
Aug-01-11 10:02 AM |
#58 |
-
Do you think that pain is imaginary? |
Jim__ |
Jul-29-11 09:36 AM |
#55 |
 -
Good points and the arguments he has been making |
TZ |
Jul-29-11 12:08 PM |
#56 |
  -
I would love to see a clear list of the logical fallacies I am using, and teling me |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-02-11 05:11 PM |
#63 |
 -
Would you feel better if, rather than calling your argument illogical, we called it nonsensical? |
Orrex |
Aug-03-11 12:55 AM |
#65 |
 -
Sense is imaginary. |
laconicsax |
Aug-03-11 02:38 AM |
#66 |
  -
Do you really not understand agreements don't exist outside of the imagination? |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-03-11 11:35 AM |
#68 |
 -
I understand that perfectly. |
laconicsax |
Aug-03-11 01:58 PM |
#70 |
 -
Oh, sorry. nt |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-03-11 02:13 PM |
#71 |
 -
. |
Orrex |
Aug-03-11 07:29 PM |
#73 |
 -
Perhaps a concrete example will help you out. |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-03-11 11:33 AM |
#67 |
 -
"Would you classify pain as imaginary?" |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-02-11 04:56 PM |
#60 |
-
Do you think pain exists outside of our imagination? If so, where does it exist? |
Jim__ |
Aug-03-11 04:57 PM |
#72 |
-
My wife teaches anatomy, so I asked her what pain is. |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-05-11 12:08 PM |
#74 |
-
"A witch's love spell may have specific trappings and words, but that doesn't make the spell any ... |
Jim__ |
Aug-07-11 10:07 AM |
#75 |
-
An important distinction not made simply by using the word "imaginary"... |
Silent3 |
Aug-16-11 03:20 PM |
#77 |
-
+1 |
laconicsax |
Aug-16-11 04:30 PM |
#78 |
-
Can you explain what you mean by... |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-21-11 03:55 PM |
#79 |