27. I thought I was reading the courts' opinions when I went to the link provided.
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 11:37 PM by stopbush
No, I didn't download and read the entire decision(s) as outlined in the drill-down pdfs. Why would I do that? The one-sentence reasons provided from the records made clear why the courts denied the plaintiff's claims that the vaccines in question caused autism. I couple that with the myriad studies that fail to show any link between vaccines and autism. I couple that with the fact that the doctor who first advanced this theory falsified his evidence.
Taken as a whole, I don't see any reason to give any credence to the claims that vaccines cause autism.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
