You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: The specific damages were intentional emotional distress. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. The specific damages were intentional emotional distress.
The Snyder family showed they suffered real emotional distress, demonstrated in their testimony and backed up by physicians.

Phelps' defense was that the Snyder son was a PUBLIC figure by merit of having an obituary in the news, making him subject to public interest. This was, however, a ridiculous defense.

Even Phelps's own defense wasn't that this was simply offensive - they had to resort to a sham argument about the son being a public figure.

The lines will be drawn differently across the board as they depend on state torts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC