You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #78: Jesus Christ on a trailer hitch, do I have to spoon feed you everything? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #72
78. Jesus Christ on a trailer hitch, do I have to spoon feed you everything?
Unfortunately, these talking points don't come with instructions.

"these talking points" meaning the idiotic and overused "do atheists believe in love" question.



They must just be told to post it and wait for the godless heathens to start denouncing their atheism in the face of such indisputable logic.

"They" being the people who visit the websites and learn to ask idiotic and overused questions like the one above in the hopes that their clever ploy will trip up the stupid and unsuspecting atheists who have never seen it before.

Nowhere did I state that you denounced atheism or claimed it was illogical.





No, RA is correct."it is going to be this fricking silly argument again"
The "Does Love Exist?" trap isn't going to work on us.

It's neither clever nor original as you can see from RA's link.

Kudos to the atheists in here for not taking the bait.

RA was correct when he told you I was referring to previous threads asking the same idiotic question.


Again, nowhere did I state that you denounced atheism or claimed it was illogical.






That's what this was supposed to be, except we didn't fall for it.

The same internet that lets you check christian websites for instructions on how to use fallacies to prove atheism is illogical also allows atheists to collect and dissect them.


This was in reply to your post:

I invite you to look for a post of mine where I made any such ..
.. argument. You won't find such a post.




Let's hear that again:

That's what this was supposed to be




One more time:

supposed to be



And once more for clarity:

supposed



Do you know the definition of the word "supposed" or shall I post that for you too?








Point out where exactly I stated that you denounced atheism or claimed it was illogical.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC