You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #135: Well, to be fair, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #113
135. Well, to be fair,
we don't need to read Hitler's mind. We have Mein Kampf out there for all to read. Oh, and all the historical records, his political speeches, and oh... his actions... which definitely put a question mark on his "Christianity." Can one hate and torture Jews and still be a "proper" Christian? One would have to follow Jesus' two commandments to the best of their abilities to do so: Love God and Love One Another as you love Me. Not to mention that Jesus, according to the New Testament, was Jewish. So, can one hate the Jewish and still be a follower of Christ?

I would think that Hitler's whole life was anathema to that, as are many other historical "Christian" leaders. But, with the mix of Paganism, Nationalism, and Aryanism at the core of his beliefs, I think it's a valid question to study whether Hitler was still actually Christian or not.

I'm not denying in any way that he was influenced by his Catholic background or German Christianity (Lutheranism). He definitely invoked Christian terms and ideas in his speeches. But, to remain a practicing Catholic, one must attend masses throughout their lives. History shows that he didn't maintain a weekely mass attendance, nor did he fully embrace Lutheranism. So, while he never officially renounced Christianity, he didn't formally practice Christianity, either.

So, can't the answer be that he was a lapsed Christian? That's how I would define him. According to both Catholic and Lutheran beliefs, the belief in the Occult is anathema to Christianity, and he was into the Occult.

None of this means, however, that he was an atheist. His interest in the occult proves that he wasn't an atheist. And he does believe in God, and he believes in Jesus, but not the biblical Jewish Jesus. Can one deny Him, His Ancestry, and His two commandments and still be a Christian? One can proclaim that they are Christians, but when you deny who Jesus is and deny His two commandments, at the very least you are a horrible Christian. But, I would suspect that your Christian faith is false.

And I honestly don't understand why that is problematic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC