You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #54: Your responses never suggest that you have any idea what is being said. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. Your responses never suggest that you have any idea what is being said.
I do not mean thereby to imply that if you understood what I said you would automatically agree with it, since I commonly encounter people who clearly understand what I say and yet disagree: I mean that your responses suggest no understanding whatsoever of what I say

I did not claim lack of belief in gods or the supernatural automatically asserts that things or people cannot change. Nor did I claim that because someone is skeptical, and doesn't believe in any gods, they are automatically without imagination. Perhaps you ought to review carefully what is meant by "straw man" before you jam words in my mouth and then indignantly ridicule those words, that I never said and that you yourself jam into my mouth.

BurtWorm's #45 suggests BurtWorm believes all human experience can be covered by a naturalistic view. In response, I quoted the very suggestive opening from Kierkegaard's long essay on the commandment "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." BurtWorm's #48 indicates BurtWorm considers that I do not examine my own illusions with an adequately critical mind. While I am not certain what BurtWorm means by "illusion", I expect he means something like "an imagined state of affairs contrary to actual fact." While not made entirely explicit, I suspect that BurtWorm intends something like: "It is undesireable for people to flee from reality into dreamworlds" -- and if this is the case, I largely agree with BurtWorm, but the point of my reply was: "It is also undesireable for us to abandon completely our dreamworlds."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC