Democratic Underground - No, it wasn't.

Reply #159: No, it wasn't. [View All]

HiFructosePronSyrup

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Oct-30-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #158

159. No, it wasn't.

Post #77 was an absurd dodge, as explained in posts #79, 81, and 85.

"If it is, and you therefore hold the Bible requires the execution of gays, then you have proven the point of the OP."

Yes, the Bible requires the execution of gays.

And that proves my point that the Bible is stupid.

It doesn't prove the OP's point. The OP would claim that the fact that the Bible calls for the execution of gays means that Christians and the Christian God are paternalistic, petty, sadistic, etc.

It doesn't mean that. It just means the Bible itself, and the people who believe in the literal interpretation, are petty, sadistic and homophobic.

As for the Christian God, there's no such thing.

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

Reply #159: No, it wasn't. [View All]