Reply #75: I like syllogisms.

[cosmik debris]

Try this one.

1. Poster X knows that the phrase "fundamentalist atheist" is offensive to many other posters. He has been told that many times.

2. Poster X intentionally uses the phrase "fundamentalist atheist" frequently.

3. Conclusion: Poster X intentionally offends people frequently.

Then try this one.

1. Poster X knows that offending people will result in disruption of a thread. He has been told that many times.

2. Poster X intentionally offend people frequently.

3. Conclusion: Poster X knowingly disrupts threads.

The nice thing about syllogisms is that to argue against the conclusion, you must disprove a premise or undermine the logic. So give it your best shot. And lets see if you can refute this without ad hominem attacks.

Edit to change insult to offend.