|
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 04:53 PM by Beetwasher
So I can't comment knowledgeably on this particular film, however, art is "allowed" to show violence in order to illustrate the ideological supremacy of non-violence, and it does so without being hypocrital. It's been done many, many times. There are plenty of examples of violent films that make very powerful anti-violence statements. This movie may in fact be just another violent "kung fu" flick, then again, it could be a good film, with a good message that uses violence to illustrate it's point. Having not seen it though, I wouldn't know. :shrug:
|