Reply #67: What's incredulous is your faith-based jargon and avoidance of analytical thought.

[WillE]

What is incredulous is your faith-based belief that Bush won.

How ridiculous and unprofessional. And you speak of incredulity?

You have not done one iota of analysis, and you dare to call TIA's True Vote sensitivity analysis a mere confirmation of belief? Why are you afraid of addressing trhe content of the analysis?

OTOH, your true colors have never shown as clearly as in this thread,

This is really turning into a total fiasco for you. You are resorting to incredulous comments on any and all analysis. But that is what you do. That is what you have always done.

I guess you will just go go on embarrassing yourself forever.

I have better things to do than continue to reply in your unending campaign to debase all sense of the scientific process for your faith-based, insincere exposition of things you must know are untrue.

Such as your belief in false recall, reluctant Bush responder, swing vs. redshift and that exit polls not designed to uncover fraud therefore they should not be used for any analysis. Well, its true that you don't use them at all and just rely on your "beliefs".

And you call yourself a political scientist?
All I see is Politics, but no Science.

Now I know how Galileo felt.