Reply #2: Help me get this all straight.

[Wilms]

By the reports shared I understand the following...

- galloglas admits butting heads with these folks in the past

- he admits going there in part to make a point but doesn't mention legal counsel that might have helped in the staging of this street theater, and has no other witness apart from his son.

- he admits knowingly not giving sufficient ID at first

- he may not have had a required signature on the precinct ID card (I'm not sure about this one)

- he got "chest-bumped" but hasn't filed an assault charge against the bumper.

- he makes no mention of Democratic party judges present and their part in this mess.

Is this all correct? :shrug:


This is reminding me of galloglas' failed "Hand Counted Paper Ballot Initiative" that nowhere mentioned a requirement for hand counting paper ballots.


Still, I'll bet a lot of polling places will have knowledgeable workers as a result and that's a good thing.