You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #215: Exactly, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #213
215. Exactly,
And how does one go about deciding how many votes may have been switched by old-fashioned punching parties -- in the Warren County lockdown in particular but also everywhere else? I believe that the standard control mechanism of controlling and accounting for the unused punch cards broke down in many (maybe most) counties. For this one concern alone, I don't see how anyone can demonstrate that the election wasn't stolen. The best case is, IMO, that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the election wasn't stolen. In other words, I believe the converse of what you said (that's where we usually start from, isn't it?).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC