Reply #50: whom are you trying to confuse about what?

[OnTheOtherHand]

As you know, I'm identified in my profile -- and I've linked to my work in this very thread. I try not to pound on my own credentials when they are irrelevant, as they usually are, and as they ought to be here.

The premise of the OP is that the evidence that Kerry won Ohio is akin to the evidence for anthropogenic global warming. But, as I assume you also know, there is strong expert support for anthropogenic global warming, whereas I'm not sure I've ever seen a peer-reviewed article arguing that Kerry won Ohio. I think election integrity advocates ought to know that, and maybe ought to think about why that is.

What dog do you think I have in this fight? Are you really that confused about how academics operate? or are you just hoping that other people will be?