Reply #219: That is a non answer. I asked you why you needed to bring up defamation.

[EFerrari]

And I ask again, why did you need to do that?

I haven't alleged anything about that grifter that you are so cosy with, I only pointed out what the whole internet could read.

So, why did you need to bring up defamation in this thread -- as if that empty threat would actually have an effect? You should know better than that, too. Good grief.

No, it's not true that only a court can determine truth. We each of us have to do that every day. Most people would call that "adult responsibility". Most people would know that intuitively. They wouldn't have to tap dance around the issue.

You haven't answered my question. So, let me rephrase it.

Why are you supporting a known abuser of activists and a known tax evader? Someone who didn't have the poise to be a user in good standing on this forum?

You can't be a little pregnant, Land Shark. And that is what you are trying to be. It won't work. The word on this grifter is out.