Reply #66: oh, golly, do you really want to go down this road?

[OnTheOtherHand]

Actually, if I were committed to attempting to discredit you, I could go a heck of a lot further.

If you have a response to my statistical arguments, make it; if you have a response to the legal arguments, make it. This is a discussion board, right? It's silly to complain that I am slowing you down. It's even silly to complain that I am opposing you.

I didn't call you goofy. I do think that some of your legal arguments have been poor, and I think I am entitled to that judgment even as a non-lawyer. Certainly people have expressed all sorts of derogatory opinions about my statistical arguments, and I don't recall your ever launching into all this hand wringing about the time commitment they made to discrediting me.

"but it's not goofy to suggest that takings claims would be made" -- nor did I say that it was. You've practically stood my actual statements upside down.