Reply #1: So, what we have is...

[BeFree]

... election machinery that for two election cycles has had an operating system that can be easily hacked in one or all of three ways.

Given all we know about actions the destroyers of democracy have undertaken to deny, thwart, and deceive, and that these machines have had a hole in them one could drive a truck thru, how can anyone continue suggesting that the hacks were not exploited?

But that is what we have: There are people, even here, who still deny that these machines had any great influence upon the 2004 elections.

Is it denial, or is it willful disregard for the possibilities? Seeing as how the facts are undeniable, it leaves us little room but to conclude it is willful disregard.