Reply #5: Can't really be summarized but

[Land Shark]

1. They cited overruled cases as being a statute of limitation on our case
2. They mischaracterized and misunderstood the complaint
3. The failed to deal with the strongest points of the complaint completely.
4. They failed to cite controlling legal authority
5. The county shows once again that it's controlled by Sequoia.
6. Great hypothetical showing why the contract entered into 2 and a half years ago can't possibly be beyond challenge now: What if the county made a contract with sequoia to outlaw all speech about Sequoia, would those who are prosecuted for speaking about Sequoia after learning of this more than two years later be powerless to defend against the County's actions against them because they "waited" two years to challenge the contract? (better worded in the original)
7. Much more. You're missing out if you don't read it. It summarizes the legal approach along the way. I've edited out a few pages above so it's not really 22 pages double, more like 18 pages double, and 8 pages single spaced.