Reply #3: This is in fact what I had suspected all along...

[LightningFlash]

"Liddle unfortunately does not point out that the USCV analysis was based on these very same K and B partisan response rates patterns that she investigates in her paper."

Unfortunately is an understatement, she barely even moves off her theory that there is in fact an unprecedented precinct mean bias. In this case, the uniform precinct bias should be far more divergant. It should be completely random, and in every way it is not.

It goes from one side of the country in the other, and shows the same result in up to 4 previous elections where Mitofsky first made the idea. The very concept of the reluctant responder was used as a covert "guess" in order to hide the real truth of what happened there.....And I bet being on the corporate payroll has alot to do with that.

Rest in pieces reluctant responder, we hardly knew ye uniform invisible guess.

:hi: