You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: Not good argument. Innuendo and supposition. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Boredtodeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-05 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Not good argument. Innuendo and supposition.
There's not much "evidence" in that document, no matter what the version is you are reading. The only evidence is the police report, the memos/letters from the SoS and they say nothing admissible in a courtroom.

Horribly disjointed, badly written and hyperbole in the same fashion as Bev Harris.

The errors are abundant and destroy the credibilty of the small bits of fact.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC