Reply #26: TEXT OF ENSIGN's BILL HERE: (followed by differences between it and Dodds)

[meganmonkey]

This is the bill from 2004 - the bill he is proposing next week is identical:

Voting Integrity and Verification Act of 2004 (Introduced in Senate)
S 2437 IS
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2437
To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require a voter-verified permanent record or hardcopy under title III of such Act, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 18, 2004
Mr. ENSIGN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration
________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require a voter-verified permanent record or hardcopy under title III of such Act, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Voting Integrity and Verification Act of 2004'.
SEC. 2. PROMOTING ACCURACY, INTEGRITY, AND SECURITY THROUGH PRESERVATION OF A VOTER-VERIFIED PERMANENT PAPER RECORD.
(a) IN GENERAL- Section 301(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15481(a)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)(A)--
(A) by striking clause (i) and inserting the following new clause:
`(i) permit the voter to verify the accuracy of their ballot (in a private and independent manner), by allowing the voter to review an individual paper version of the voter's ballot before the voter's ballot is cast and counted;';
(B) in clause (ii)--
(i) by inserting `discovered on the individual paper version of the voter's ballot' after `to change the ballot or correct any error'; and
(ii) by striking `and' after the semicolon at the end;
(C) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv); and
(D) by inserting after clause (ii) the following new clause:
`(iii)(I) preserve the individual paper version of the voter's ballot, after the voter has certified that the same accurately reflects the voter's intent, as the individual permanent paper record, and
`(II) preserve such individual permanent paper record at the polling place in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (2)(B)(i); and';
(2) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking `subparagraph (A)(iii)' and inserting `subparagraph (A)(iv)'; and
(3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph:
`(2) MANUAL AUDIT CAPACITY-
`(A) IN GENERAL- The voting system shall produce an individual permanent paper record for each ballot that is cast which provides for voter verification of such record in accordance with paragraph (1)(A) and which meets the requirements of subparagraph (B).
`(B) MANUAL AUDIT CAPACITY-
`(i) The voting system shall produce an individual permanent paper record for each ballot cast that is either--
`(I) preserved within the polling place in the manner in which all other paper ballots are preserved within such polling place; or
`(II) in the absence of such manner or method, which is consistent with the manner employed by the jurisdiction for preserving paper ballots in general.
`(ii) Each paper record produced under clause (i) shall be suitable for a manual audit equivalent or superior to that of a paper ballot voting system.
`(iii) All electronic records produced by any voting system shall be consistent with the individual permanent paper records produced by such voting system. In the event of any inconsistencies or irregularities between any electronic records and the individual permanent paper records, the individual permanent paper records shall be the true and correct record of the votes cast.
`(iv) The individual permanent paper records produced under clause (i) shall be used as the official records for purposes of any recount or audit conducted with respect to any election for Federal office in which the voting system is used.'.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE- The amendments made by this section shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the Help America Vote Act of 2002.

----------------

The most important differences between this and the Dodd bill:

Dodd/Clinton/Dem bill will not require implementation until 2009, and any machines purchased before then will be exempt. Meaning that for the next 4 years (including 2 major federal elections) counties/states can continue to purchase machines with no paper trail. AND, when the bill goes into effect, the machines purchased before 2009 will be allowed to remain.

The Ensign Bill is simple and will be enacted immediately, as though it had been part of HAVA. It closes a loophole created by HAVA in defining 'paper trail' Ensign's bill will require that there is a VOTER VERIFIED PAPER BALLOT that will override a machine count in case of audit/recount. The voter will APPROVE that paper ballot. The Ensign Bill is identical to the one he proposed late last summer. At that time it had BIPARTISAN support but Congress never got around to debating/voting on it.