You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: In my web form e-mail to her I told her this: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
69. In my web form e-mail to her I told her this:
This was 12/12/04

Honorable Senator Boxer,

First, although belatedly, I would like to congratulate on your win by such a large margin. I can rest comfortably knowing that you will continue to represent us.

My pressing concern, along with so many of my friends and acquaintances today is the issue of voting irregularities and the questions of election fraud in Ohio and possibly other States.

An article by Mr. Wayne Madsen also claims padding of votes in "safe" States such as our State to ensure the popular vote for Mr. Bush.
I have expressed my concern already to Congressman Conyers, as I truly have a hard time believing that voters who believe in you and Mr. Waxman would not vote for Senator Kerry for president.

There are numerous people going over the data in many States, and I hope this issue is going to be taken seriously by both parties.
Major media for whatever reason, chooses to dismiss this issue, but can we really rely on an election system, when so many voters feel that something is not right? When so many mathematicians and statisticians post their findings of this election to be an extreme anomaly.

Please support Congressman Conyers in his effort on the Senate side, as well as the citizens, who are marching in the 51 Capitol March. I have no doubt that you will fully support Senator Kerry with any inspection of the machines and or recount in Ohio.

Respectfully yours,

xxxxx

I believe we all have to now follow up with all the data to be sent to the Senators.
I am still looking at the now final CA data and Kerry still has less votes than her in 46 counties. I am trying to do some what if scenarios, such as the difference going to other candidates, and even when I deduct ALL the votes for the other candidates from Kerry Boxer difference, Kerry still has less votes in many counties. Meanwhile, a close to equal number of non-votes exist as there are other candidate votes statewide. Looking at statewide totals seems deceptive at first glance, and therefore has to be scrutinized per county results.

The biggest % No-Votes for prez and sen occured in

Mariposa 671 818
Percent 7.2% 8.8%

the final prez result in Mariposa was
Kerry-Bush
3,251 5,215
37.6% 60.3%

the final sen race
Boxer-Jones
3,437 4,751
40.4% 55.9%

Registration there is quite red but does not reach 50%

Dem-Rep-Decline to State
3,654 5,340 1,485
32.52% 47.53% 13.22%

Mariposa machines used
Optical Scan: Precinct-Based
Sequoia Voting Systems, Inc.

Any ideas on this one?

I hope there are others going through the CA data, as I am not a Math wiz...


:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC