Reply #68: Gloomy Gus strikes again...

[pacalo]

When you investigated WhatsHisFace’s skimpy military record I had respect for your opinion, but I’ve learned something since then. In almost every thread that is hopeful about investigating the election fraud, you’ve made it a point to show up to discount all hope of it happening.

I know you don’t like WhatsHisFace, or at least you have contempt for his military record. I see now, however, that you’ve re-directed your discontent toward Kerry, perhaps because your candidate didn’t get the nomination. So, perhaps in your view, or at least in your attitude, the election results are Kerry’s fault.

I have news for you: No Democratic candidate would have defeated WhatsHisFace’s vote-stealing machine.

You said in another thread that John Kerry wasn’t the best candidate. That only tells me that there’s sour grapes against Kerry. You also said in that same post that Howard Dean was your man. What if Dean had won the nomination? Remember how the corporate media tore him to shreds after “the scream”? Instead of continuing in his in-your-face mode, he toned it down quite a bit. He succumbed to the pressure & he shelved away the part of his persona that drew people toward him. I would have had more respect for him if he had ignored the jokes & the criticism & continued in the same stride.

So you don’t like Kerry -- get over it, just like you’re telling us to get into fetal position & give up all hope of drawing attention to the election fraud. If you can’t join us, then perhaps you should get out of the way. Your Gloomy Gus posts in hopeful threads only serve to entertain the freepers. I bet they love you.