Reply #52: OK, fair enough.

[ewulf]

I'm not demanding to be certified or anything, I was just questioning the need to attack the honest of someone who gave, all in all, a reasonable enough account. Although the fraud in Ohio may have been perpetuated in a great many precincts, maybe even most of them, it seems it was mostly done behind the scenes, by changing small numbers of votes during the tabulation process rather than by doing anything blatant that an election monitor would see. He did see long lines that amounted to voter suppression, which was a common sight in Ohio and which was, in itself outrageous. He didn't say that he saw technicians come in and fix the machines, or any more of the inelegant screw ups that were seen in some places, but that, it itself, isn't the weird.

Still, you have a right to believe what you want, and maybe your right, maybe it is kinda strange that someone without and interesting election fraud story would want to discuss there experiences on 11/2. But please, don't belittle the importance of Nevada, even if its warranted. I spent to much time there to want to think about that.