Reply #97: In this particular election we have no idea whether some of the races

[eomer]

were stolen by machine fraud. In the other years we have no idea whether some of them were stolen by machine fraud.

In all of the years being discussed we won some and they won some. What, again is your point? That unless they steal all of the races then they must not have stolen any of them?

It is perfectly reasonable to think that, if they are going to steal some elections, the pattern of which ones they steal may be totally erratic and unpredictable.

You start with an assumption that is unfounded and then extrapolate from it using relationships that are imaginary. Other than that your argument is fine.