You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: Thanks, MJ. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Thanks, MJ.
I agree that handling the ballot would encourage verification.

But then, so would a separate "Ballot Verifier". No?

Here's my trip. I was interested in the hands-off design because of voters with mobility-issues. That, apparently, is one of the sticking points. AutoMark is sometimes toughted as the answer, but to that specific problem, I think the answer is no.

So, for the mobility-limited voter, I've wondered about a machine that automatically spits out the ballot, runs it thru a Verifier, then into the box.

This is roughly based on what I read reffered to as a "Modular System". So adapted, I wondered if it offered everyone a way out of this jam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC