Reply #21: The Caller either missed this one or is deliberately boosting GOP Sales's

[Czolgosz]

candidacy.

If know people who personally know both candidates, and some like him better and some like her better because that's a subjective measure.

Who has more experience is not at all subjective, and it's clear he has a ton more experience than she does. She has been involved in a couple of trial, one of which US District Court Judge Jan Jack says she screwed up by unethically hiding a witness from the other side -- that's not a rumor, there is a written record of the proceedings available from the federal court. Also, when the Caller said her "experience as an attorney with the law firm of Paul Kratzig & Associates gives her the edge," apparently the Caller did not bother to check that she's only been at that firm for 2 years! What law firm gives you such amazingly great experience that two years at the firm qualified you to be a judge?! Plus, if Paul Kratzig doesn't trust her experience at his firm enough to make her a full partner, why should the Caller trust her two years' experience at the firm to make her to be a judge?

If the Caller had said, we're endorsing her because she's a real go-getter, or because we know something about her opponent that causes us concern, then maybe I could take that endorsement seriously, but when the Caller says that she has more experience, that's just sloppy (or deliberately misleading) reporting.

By the way, you can call over at the US Attorney's office and confirm that her opponent has had a very active (and successful) jury trial docket.