... but it sounds like you're stuck within the frame of life insurance as a "benefit" for the employee... and the frame of "rules" that that entails.
This is a whole different pancake.
Provide me with some documentation that says that a company is not legally allowed to pay those tax costs for a policy, and then you'll win me over. In the meantime, I think you are stuck in the "box" of benefits regulations... which would obviously lead to corporations shifting costs to beneficiaries wherever they can justify doing so.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
