You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #111: I'm a Christian and i don't see incompatibility between science and xtianity [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
111. I'm a Christian and i don't see incompatibility between science and xtianity
Edited on Mon Jul-13-09 12:30 PM by supernova
:shrug:

Sure, science and religion (in this case xtianity) are trying to answer similar questions, among them:

Who are we?

Where did we come from?

Where might we be headed in the future?

What is this place and of what is it made?

But, for me, they are coming at those question from different areas.

Science is interested in answering "how" and "why?"

Religion offers a "who" with an overlapping "why," as in "why am *I* here?"

Anyway, I don't see science and xtianity as incompatible at all. I accept with wonder all that human science as to offer and I equally am fascinated with and enjoy a relationship with God. They are like two sides of the same coin to me, going after the same goal but with differing methods. There is no reason I can't enjoy the benefits of both.

The Universe is, near as we can tell 14 billion years old. The sun is roughly 13 billion years old (middle-aged for similar stars apparently) The earth is 6.5 billion years old. Life happens on this planet through evolution. We humans evolved through millions of years and Homo Sapiens, our current species, is about 100,00 years old.

To me the Bible is a record of the Jewish People (the OT), and of other ordinary human beings in the Jewish and wider classical world trying to explain, what they believed to be encounters with the Divine (NT). I never believed the bible was literally true and was never taught that in the first place. As with other great writing, the authors in the Bible use all rhetorical devices to get their meaning across: fables, metaphors, allegory, symbolism, and so on. Do I believe a person called Jesus was divine. No. I think he somehow made a humongous leap in his thinking about what makes communities work and what makes a great life, and how to protest living under occupation and wanted to share that with everyone. This message was so clearly dangerously effective, he was put down by the state (the Roman Empire) for it. As for miracles, I believe that the people who wrote them believed in them.

edit: Now, I am not an evangelical, and haven't read the whole thing, but it appears Francis Collins is of a similar mindset to me. And I don't think of myself as unusual at all. If he's an effective top scientist in his field, my beef isn't with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC