You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: Some indications here: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Some indications here:
She joined a ruling here that denied the New York State Restaurant Association's argument that regulations requiring nutritional content information on their menus violated the restaurant's first amendment rights:

In this case, the New York State Restaurant Association (NYSRA), a not-for-profit
business association of over 7,000 restaurants, challenges the constitutionality of New York City
Health Code 81.50, which requires roughly ten percent of restaurants in New York City,
including chains such as McDonalds, Burger King and Kentucky Fried Chicken, to post calorie
content information on their menus and menu boards...

Furthermore,
although the restaurants are protected by the Constitution when they engage in commercial
speech, the First Amendment is not violated, where as here, the law in question mandates a
simple factual disclosure of caloric information and is reasonably related to New York Citys
goals of combating obesity...

For the reasons stated above, we reject NYSRAs challenge to Regulation 81.50 because
we conclude that it is not preempted by the NLEA and does not violate NYSRAs member
restaurants First Amendment rights. Because this panel did not grant a stay of enforcement of
the district courts order and NYSRA and its member restaurants are complying with Regulation
81.50, or facing fines for non-compliance, no further action is required by this Court.

http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/188edcb...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC