You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: You want 'accountability' now? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. You want 'accountability' now?
where were you when Reagan pushed through all the 'de-regulation'? Where were you when Bush accelerated it? What do you expect a Committee to do when it is 'legal' for these financial institutions to do whatever the fuck they want? What a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Barney Frank: Its Nonsensical To Retain AIG Employees To Undo The Mess They Created ProSense  Mar-17-09 10:43 AM   #0 
  - of course it is, Barney  AngryAmish   Mar-17-09 10:52 AM   #1 
  - How much payola does Andrew Sorkin receive from the likes of AIG?  LiberalFighter   Mar-17-09 11:27 AM   #2 
  - Andrew Ross Sorkin? Who had not graduated from high school yet in 1995?  LiberalFighter   Mar-17-09 11:31 AM   #3 
  - Anyone involved at a high level with the financial products dvision should be terminated with cause  alcibiades_mystery   Mar-17-09 11:33 AM   #4 
  - Failures in finance MUST be rewarded and retained!  Bluenorthwest   Mar-17-09 11:54 AM   #5 
  - It's also nonsensical to retain the head of House Financial Services Committee  hugo_from_TN   Mar-17-09 12:16 PM   #6 
  - Unlike the head of AIG and its greedy executives, the members of the committee were elected  ProSense   Mar-17-09 12:23 PM   #7 
     - Because the Financial Services Committee did a horrendous job of overseeing  hugo_from_TN   Mar-17-09 12:26 PM   #8 
     - It's Franks fault that AIG, UBS and the other banks are corrupt?  ProSense   Mar-17-09 12:31 PM   #10 
     - Here is their charter  hugo_from_TN   Mar-17-09 12:47 PM   #17 
     - You seem to be a bit confused regarding the roles of regulation and oversight.  TahitiNut   Mar-17-09 12:35 PM   #12 
     - Did the financial services industry..  stillcool   Mar-17-09 09:09 PM   #21 
     - FSC  stklurker   Mar-17-09 12:31 PM   #9 
        - Another confused person. n/t  ProSense   Mar-17-09 12:33 PM   #11 
           - nope, not confused at all  stklurker   Mar-17-09 12:36 PM   #13 
              - You posted a definition? No, you're confused.  ProSense   Mar-17-09 12:39 PM   #14 
              - yep  stklurker   Mar-17-09 12:42 PM   #15 
                 - "but did the committee EVER give a heads up" Are you joking?  ProSense   Mar-17-09 12:49 PM   #18 
                    - committee  stklurker   Mar-17-09 08:47 PM   #19 
              - You want 'accountability' now?  stillcool   Mar-17-09 09:04 PM   #20 
  - Thanks for posting Prosense. I'm totally anti-Sorkin's plan.  vaberella   Mar-17-09 12:47 PM   #16 
  - love barney frank  spanone   Mar-17-09 09:10 PM   #22 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC