You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #399: That you have to resort to misquoting me is telling. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #381
399. That you have to resort to misquoting me is telling.
It tells me that you have no idea what I've said, and instead have superimposed your perception on both the cartoon and this thread.

It's a shame that the 'logic of a three year-old' escapes you.

In history, racist assholes have referred to black people as 'chimps', 'monkeys', 'apes' etc. Also in history, cartoonists have put animals in cartoons... including non-human primates, for purposes other than disparaging people.

Here's what's fascinating about your post;

You have decided, before any other consideration, that this was "done to" Obama. That much is obvious. What your perception filter has created is an absolute presumption of intent... which is why you imagine that this cartoon would be directed at McCain were he President. It can't occur to you, even on the stage of an alternate scenario, that the cartoon represents any other commentary than the one you've decided it must... despite the fact that there is no reference to the President unless you presume intent.

Basically, you made up your mind based on one piece of criteria and only because Obama is President. Everyone, yourself included, is in a heightened state of prejudice because Obama is in office. I can't blame anyone for that, and I'm sure that the 'dogwhistle' theory may hold water. But again; to conclude that the artist's intent was 'racism' requires making presumptions about his intent rather than relying on what's in the depiction. As I say; "Were McCain President, this cartoon would just indicate the artist's distaste for the stim bill." No one would think it was 'done to' McCain.

If what you're saying is that no one can put a non-human primate in any cartoon or commentary for the next eight years, no matter how innocent, simply because Obama is President, then say so and we can discuss that rationally. If you just want to insult and accuse, then feel free. Only one of those choices deserves respect.

Try asking questions if you don't understand what I'm saying, I'll answer them honestly and you will see my intentions are fair and reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC