You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Nah, it was Roberts arrogance. Most Justices have a copy of the oath with them. Roberts was going [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. Nah, it was Roberts arrogance. Most Justices have a copy of the oath with them. Roberts was going
to show that he was so brilliant that he did not need no stinkin' notes. Instead, he showed the opposite. Obama was, as always, too cool, stopping and nodding at Roberts to go again. But, in the future, the CJ should be required to read the oath, and in segments of three or four words, so that the Prez Elect doesn't screw up the echo either. This is, after all, the Constitution they are quoting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC