Reply #23: Besides this already being answered....

[gcomeau]

...with a simple read through the case already presented... who the hell CARES if it was an official TANG photo or a personal one????

The case only requires three things.

1. Bush was photographed wearing the ribbon. So unless someone drugged him incoherent, stuck the ribbon on him without his knowledge, photographed him so they could stick him with it 30 years later in his presidential re-election campaign and then somehow got the photo into his official Guard records AND his father's presidential library in a vast illuminati-esque conspiracy Bush wore that ribbon himself.

2. No unit Bush EVER served with in a capacity which would have entitled him to wear that ribbon earned it while he was serving with them.

3. The ribbon is not authorized for temporary wear so if a unit earned it while he WASN'T serving with them he's not entitled to wear it.

All three of the above have been extensively established. Case closed. What's this serious flaw you apparently think exists but don't seem to be able to spell out or us?

-Grant